ISSN 2412-4036 (print)
ISSN 2713-1823 (online)

The role of spleen elastometry in the non-invasive assessment of portal hypertension in liver cirrhosis

T. Alaeddinе, Y.M. Ngameni, O.I. Tarasova

RUDN University, Moscow, Russian Federation

Background. Portal hypertension (PH) is one of the leading complications of liver cirrhosis (LC) and determines the risk of developing esophageal varices (EV). Measurement of the hepatic venous pressure gradient is considered a standard indicator of PH; however, this method is invasive and has limited availability. In recent years, spleen elastometry has become a promising non-invasive method for assessing the severity of PH in patients with LC.
Objective: To study the diagnostic value of spleen elastometry in patients with PH associated with LC in the compensation stage and to evaluate the correlation between spleen stiffness (SS) parameters and clinical and instrumental PH features.
Materials and methods. A prospective cross-sectional study included 44 patients (26 male and 18 female individuals) with PH associated with LC and the development of grade 1–2 EVs. All participants underwent liver transient elastography using a FibroScan 502 Touch (Probe M) device and spleen elastometry using a BIOSS ANGIODIN-Sono/P-Ultra ultrasound system. The average age of the participants was 50 (44–60) years. According to the Child–Pugh scale, 26 patients (59.1%) were classified as class A cirrhosis and 18 patients (40.9%) as class B. Esophageal varices (EV) of grade 1 were detected in 20 (45.5%) patients and grade 2 in 24 (54.5%) patients. Spleen size (longitudinal and transverse), liver stiffness (LS) and SS, platelet levels, albumin, international normalized ratio (INR), and EV grade (based on esophagogastroduodenoscopy) were assessed.
Results. In the overall sample, the median SS of the group was 60.5 (IQR 48.0–69.0) kPa, LS – 30.6 (IQR 27.1–48.9) kPa. SS was higher in grade 2 EV than in grade 1 EV: 65.0 (IQR 61.3–69.9) vs. 50.0 (IQR 43.0–62.0) kPa (p = 0.008). The results of determination of SS in patients with LC class A and class B according to Child–Pugh were statistically insignificant (p = 0.48). Correlation analysis revealed a moderate correlation between spleen stiffness and platelet count (ρ = -0.46; p = 0.002), as well as an association with spleen length (ρ = 0.41; p = 0.006), spleen structure (ρ = 0.44; p = 0.003), and the grade of EV (ρ = 0.39; p = 0.009). Correlation between SS and LS, albumin, INR, and Child–Pugh LC class was weak and non-significant. ROC analysis for predicting grade 2 EV using SS parameters yielded the following results: area under the curve (AUC) = 0.74, cutoff value – 58 kPa (sensitivity 75%, specificity 70%).
Conclusion. SS was significantly higher in patients with grade 2 EV comparatively to grade 1 EV, while its association with Child–Pugh cirrhosis class was not found. A spleen stiffness cutoff of 58 kPa allows for a moderate differentiation (AUC = 0.74) of grade 2 EV, which can be used for risk stratification and endoscopic screening planning. Compared with LS measurements, spleen elastometry data better reflects portal hypertension severity, making this method a potential additional noninvasive tool in the management of patients with LC.

For citation: Alaeddine T, Ngameni YM, Tarasova OI. The role of spleen elastometry in the non-invasive assessment of portal hypertension in liver cirrhosis. Therapy (Moscow). 2026;12(5S):44–50.
https://dx.doi.org/10.18565/therapy.2026.5-s5.44-50

Ключевые слова

liver cirrhosis
portal hypertension
spleen elastometry
elastography
spleen stiffness
ultrasound
esophageal varices

Список литературы

1. Diaz-Soto MP, Garcia-Tsao G. Management of varices and variceal hemorrhage in liver cirrhosis: A recent update. Ther Adv Gastroenterol. 2022;15:17562848221101712.

PMID: 35937019. PMCID: PMC9354393. https://doi.org/10.1177/17562848221101712

2. Danpanichkul P, Idalsoaga F, Murray F, Arab JP, Diaz LA. The global epidemiology of alcohol-associated liver disease. Hepatol Commun. 2026;10(5):e0947.

PMID: 42043865. PMCID: PMC13120514. https://doi.org/10.1097/HC9.0000000000000947

3. Aslam A, Kwo PY. Epidemiology and disease burden of alcohol associated liver disease. J Clin Exp Hepatol. 2023;13(1):88–102.

PMID: 36647400. PMCID: PMC9840073. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jceh.2022.09.001

4. Schwarz M, Schwarz C, Burghart L, Pfisterer N, Bauer D, Hubl W, et al. Late-stage presentation with decompensated cirrhosis is alarmingly common but successful etiologic therapy allows for favorable clinical outcomes. PLoS One. 2023;18(8):e0290352.

PMID: 37616205. PMCID: PMC10449133. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0290352

5. Alberts CJ, Clifford GM, Georges D, Negro F, Lesi OA, Hutin YJ, de Martel C. Worldwide prevalence of hepatitis B virus and hepatitis C virus among patients with cirrhosis at country, region, and global levels: A systematic review. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022;7(8):724–35.

PMID: 35576953. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-1253(22)00050-4

6. Luo X, He Y, Jiang Z, Liao J. Global burden of liver cirrhosis: Trends from 1990–2021 and projections to 2060. J Health Popul Nutr. 2025;44(1):370.

PMID: 41126322. PMCID: PMC12541949. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41043-025-01109-5

7. Tang E, Torres S, Liu B, Baden R, Bhuket T, Wong RJ. High prevalence of cirrhosis at initial presentation among safety-net adults with chronic hepatitis B virus infection. J Clin Exp Hepatol. 2017;8(3):235–40.

PMID: 30302039. PMCID: PMC6175722. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jceh.2017.11.009

8. Chen R, Deng H, Ding X, Xie C, Wang W, Shen Q. Platelet count to spleen diameter ratio for the diagnosis of gastroesophageal varices in liver cirrhosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2017;2017:7407506.

PMID: 28270848. PMCID: PMC5320338. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/7407506

9. Ali B, Samuel R, Jennifer R, Li L, Yu X, Cao Y, et al. Evolving burden of metabolic dysfunction – associated steatotic liver disease and its complications in a US nationwide healthcare system. Hepatol Commun. 2026;10(1):e0878.

PMID: 41493837. PMCID: PMC12772495. https://doi.org/10.1097/HC9.0000000000000878

10. Paternostro R, Kwanten WJ, Hofer BS, Semmler G, Bagdadi A, Luzko I, et al.; A study by the Baveno Cooperation: An EASL consortium. Hepatic venous pressure gradient predicts risk of hepatic decompensation and liver-related mortality in patients with MASLD. J Hepatol. 2024;81(5):827–36.

PMID: 38823501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2024.05.033

11. Lesmana CRA, Shukla A, Kumar A, et al. Management of acute variceal bleeding: Updated APASL guidelines. Hepatol Int. 2025;19(5):1003–31.

PMID: 40886248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12072-025-10894-4

12. National Guideline Centre (UK). Cirrhosis in Over 16s: Assessment and management. London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE); 2016 Jul. (NICE Guideline, No. 50.). ISBN-13: 978-1-4731-1997-0

13. Xie XY, Benmassaoud A. Advances in the diagnosis and management of clinically significant portal hypertension in cirrhosis: A narrative review. World J Hepatol. 2025;17(6):104761.

PMID: 40606915. PMCID: PMC12210161. https://doi.org/10.4254/wjh.v17.i6.104761

14. Singla N, Shantan V, Saraswat A, Singh AP. Advances in portal pressure measurement: Endoscopic techniques, challenges, and implications for liver transplantation. World J Hepatol. 2025;17(8):107679.

PMID: 40901597. PMCID: PMC12400397. https://doi.org/10.4254/wjh.v17.i8.107679

15. Rockey DC, Alsawas M, Duarte-Rojo A, Patel K, Levine D, Asrani SK, et al. Noninvasive liver disease assessment to identify portal hypertension: Systematic and narrative reviews supporting the AASLD Practice Guideline. Hepatology. 2025;81(3):1086–104.

PMID: 38489516. https://doi.org/10.1097/HEP.0000000000000841

16. Shanka NY, Pavlov CS, Mekonnen NL. Non-invasive methods for diagnosing portal hypertension and variceal bleeding due to liver cirrhosis secondary to NAFLD/MASLD: Systematic review. Front Med (Lausanne). 2024;11:1459569.

PMID: 39911662. PMCID: PMC11794003. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2024.1459569

17. Berzigotti A. Non-invasive evaluation of portal hypertension using ultrasound elastography. J Hepatol. 2017;67(2):399–411.

PMID: 28223101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2017.02.003

18. Long MT, Gandhi S, Loomba R. Advances in non-invasive biomarkers for the diagnosis and monitoring of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Metabolism. 2020;111S:154259.

PMID: 32387227. PMCID: PMC7529729. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.metabol.2020.154259

19. Muzica C, Diaconu S, Zenovia S, Huiban L, Stanciu C, Minea H, et al. Role of spleen stiffness measurements with 2D shear-wave elastography for esophageal varices in patients with compensated advanced chronic liver disease. Diagnostics (Basel). 2025;15(6):674.

PMID: 40150016. PMCID: PMC11940978. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15060674

20. Yoo JJ, Kim SG. The rise of non-invasive tools in the diagnosis of portal hypertension: Validation of the Baveno VII Consensus. Clin Mol Hepatol. 2023;29(1):102–4.

PMID: 36353769. PMCID: PMC9845669. https://doi.org/10.3350/cmh.2022.0353

21. King H, Zeino Z, Wright K, Maurice J, Srivastava A, Przemiosloet R, et al. P65 Sorting through the stiffness: The role of splenic stiffness measurement to refine variceal screening decisions in a real-world cohort. Gut 2025;74:A55–A56.

https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2025-BASL.81

22. Hu X, Huang X, Hou J, Ding L, Su C, Meng F. Diagnostic accuracy of spleen stiffness to evaluate portal hypertension and esophageal varices in chronic liver disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Radiol. 2021;31(4):2392–404.

PMID: 32974686. PMCID: PMC7979650. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-020-07223-8. Erratum in: Eur Radiol. 2021;31(6):4396–99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-020-07446-9

23. Dajti E, Ravaioli F, Zykus R, Rautou PE, Elkrief L, Grgurevic I, et al.; Spleen Stiffness—IPD-MA Study Group. Accuracy of spleen stiffness measurement for the diagnosis of clinically significant portal hypertension in patients with compensated advanced chronic liver disease: A systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023;8(9):816–28.

PMID: 37478880. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-1253(23)00150-4

24. Wu ZG, Yang L, Wu MB, Xi WN, Sun K, Ai MX, et al. Innovations in liver disease assessment: Clinical insights from spleen stiffness measurement in chronic liver diseases. J Transl Med. 2026;24(1):887.

PMID: 42151980. PMCID: PMC13361863. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-026-08244-5

25. Giunta M, Fraquelli M. Liver and spleen stiffness in hematological diseases. In: Fraquelli M, ed. Elastography of the liver and beyond. Cham: Springer International Publishing. 2021; pp. 257–68.

ISBN: 9783030741327. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-74132-7_17

26. Zufit НE, Nimer A, Nayaf H, Awni Y, Hanna R. Multiorgan fibrosis in Gaucher disease type I: An unmet goal of enzyme replacement therapy. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol. 2025;49(8):102677.

PMID: 40876511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinre.2025.102677

27. Piolatto A, Matrone A, Bisaccia A, Lauria S, Ferrero G, Voi V. PB2506: Evidence of spleen stiffness progression by transient elastography in scd patients: Results from an exploratory study. HemaSphere. 2023;7(Suppl):e42180d0.

PMCID: PMC10428849. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.HS9.0000976724.42180.d0

28. Alhyari A, Dob O, Safai Zadeh E, Dietrich CF, Trenker C, Gress TM, Gorg C. Differentiating benign from malignant causes of splenomegaly: is acoustic radiation force impulse elastography helpful? Diseases. 2024; 12(12):308.

PMID: 39727638. PMCID: PMC1172720. https://doi.org/10.3390/diseases12120308

29. Khalilova K, Misan IA, Gusman Kuray VB, Kobalava ZhD. [Splenic stiffness as a new marker of congestion in the systemic circulation in patients with acute decompensation of chronic heart failure. Terapiya = Therapy. 2026;12(2):25–33 (In Russ.)].

EDN: IQQFDX. https://doi.org/10.18565/therapy.2026.2.25-33

30. Misaka T, Yoshihisa A, Ichijo Y, Ishibashi S, Matsuda M, Yamadera Y, et al. Prognostic significance of spleen shear wave elastography and dispersion in patients with heart failure: The crucial role of cardio-splenic axis. Clin Res Cardiol. 2023;112(7):942–53.

PMID: 36941484. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-023-02183-7

31. Bayramoglu Z, Akyol Sari ZN, Koker O, Adaletli I, Eker Omeroglu R. Shear wave elastography evaluation of liver, pancreas, spleen and kidneys in patients with familial Mediterranean fever and amyloidosis. Br J Radiol. 2021;94(1128):20210237.

PMID: 34520686. PMCID: PMC8631033. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20210237

32. Veiga ZST, Villela-Nogueira CA, Fernandes FF, Cavalcanti MG, Figueiredo FA, Pereira JL, et al. Transient elastography evaluation of hepatic and spleen stiffness in patients with hepatosplenic schistosomiasis. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017;29(6):730–35.

PMID: 28177946. https://doi.org/10.1097/MEG.0000000000000853

33. Mazur R, Celmer M, Silicki J, Hołownia D, Pozowski P, Miedzybrodzki K. Clinical applications of spleen ultrasound elastography – a review. J Ultrason. 2018;18(72):37–41.

PMID: 29844939. PMCID: PMC5911717. https://doi.org/10.15557/JoU.2018.0006

Об авторах / Для корреспонденции

Tarek Alaeddine, MD, postgraduate student of the Department of hospital therapy with courses in endocrinology, hematology, and clinical laboratory diagnostics of the Medical institute, RUDN University, Moscow, Russian Federation, Lebanese Republic
E-mail: tarek.m.a@outlook.com
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0001-7144-5918
Yannick M. Ngameni, MD, gastroenterologist-hepatologist at the Center for Liver Research named after professor P.P. Ogurtsov of the Clinical and diagnostic center, RUDN University, Moscow, Russian Federation, Republic of Cameroon
E-mail: yannickmoy43267@gmail.com
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7230-3711
Olga I. Tarasova, MD, PhD (Medicine), associate professor, associate professor of the Department of hospital therapy with courses in endocrinology, hematology, and clinical laboratory diagnostics, RUDN University, Moscow, Russian Federation.
E-mail: tarasova-oi@rudn.ru
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6376-8189. Scopus ID: 56362675300. eLibrary SPIN: 7367-7415

Также по теме