Treatment of giant cell arteritis: current possibilities and prospects of steroid-sparing therapy


DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.18565/therapy.2023.1.78-88

Meshkov A.D., Maslyansky A.L., Tkacheva O.N., Mazurov V.I.

1) N.I. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University of the Ministry of Healthcare of Russia, Moscow; 2) V.A. Almazov National Medical Research Center of the Ministry of Healthcare of Russia, Saint Petersburg; 3) Saint Petersburg State University; 4) I.I. Mechnikov North-Western State Medical University of the Ministry of Healthcare of Russia, Saint Petersburg; 5) Clinical Rheumatological Hospital No. 25, Saint Petersburg
Abstract. Approaches to the long-term therapy of giant cell arteritis (GCA) are still remaining underdeveloped. Glucocorticoids (GCS) retain the position of the «gold standard» for the treatment of this disease, but their use in many cases is complicated by the formation of steroid resistance (need for high doses of GCS), steroid dependence (inability to reduce dosages) and a wide range of complications. The role of traditional basic anti-inflammatory medicines (BAMs) in GCA treatment remains uncertain due to the lack of their efficacy and inconclusive evidence base. Current review presents data on the possibility of using targeted synthetic BAMs and genetically engineered biological medicines as second-line remedies in the treatment of GCA with an emphasis on steroid-sparing effect achieving.

Literature


1. Kondo T., Amano K. Era of steroid sparing in the management of immune-mediated inflammatory diseases. Immunol Med. 2018; 41(1): 6–11. https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09114300.2018.1451593.


2. Клинические рекомендации. Ревматоидный артрит. Ассоциация ревматологов России, ОООИ «Российская ревматологическая ассоциация «Надежда»». Рубрикатор клинических рекомендаций Минздрава России. 2021. ID: 250. Доступ: https://cr.minzdrav.gov.ru/schema/250_2 (дата обращения – 01.01.2023). [Clinical guidelines. Rheumatoid arthritis. Association of Rheumatologists of Russia, Russian Rheumatological Association «Nadezhda». Rubricator of clinical guidelines of the Ministry of Healthcare of Russia. 2021. ID: 250. URL: https://cr.minzdrav.gov.ru/schema/250_2 (date of access – 01.01.2023) (In Russ.)].


3. Smolen J.S., Landewe R.B.M., Bergstra S.A. et al. EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis with synthetic and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: 2022 update. Ann Rheum Dis. 2023; 82(1): 3–18.https://dx.doi.org/10.1136/ard-2022-223356.


4. Fraenkel L., Bathon J.M., England B.R. et al. 2021 American College of Rheumatology guideline for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. 2021; 73(7): 1108–23. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/art.41752.


5. Neumann I. Immunosuppressive and glucocorticoid therapy for the treatment of ANCA-asssociated vasculitis. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2020; 59(Suppl 3): iii60–iii67. https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/keaa035.


6. Gerard A.L., Simon-Tillaux N., Yordanov Y. et al. Efficacy and safety of steroid-sparing treatments in giant cell arteritis according to the glucocorticoids tapering regimen: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Intern Med. 2021; 88: 96–103.https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejim.2021.03.040.


7. Shirai T., Sato H., Fujii H. et al. The feasible maintenance dose of corticosteroid in Takayasu arteritis in the era of biologic therapy. Scand J Rheumatol. 2021; 50(6): 462–68. https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03009742.2021.1881155.


8. Gracia-Tello B., Ezeonyeji A., Isenberg D. The use of rituximab in newly diagnosed patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: long-term steroid saving capacity and clinical effectiveness. Lupus Sci Med. 2017; 4(1): e000182.https://dx.doi.org/10.1136/lupus-2016-000182.


9. Strehl C., Bijlsma J.W.J., De Wit M. et al. Defining conditions where long-term glucocorticoid treatment has an acceptably low level of harm to facilitate implementation of existing recommendations: Viewpoints from an EULAR task force. Ann Rheum Dis. 2016; 75(6): 952–57. https://dx.doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2015-208916.


10. Roubille C., Coffy A., Rincheval N. et al. Ten-year analysis of the risk of severe outcomes related to low-dose glucocorticoids in early rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology. 2021; 60(8): 3738–46. https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/keaa850.


11. Yasir M., Goyal A., Sonthalia S. Corticosteroid adverse effects. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2022 Jan.


12. Fardet L., Petersen I., Nazareth I. Prevalence of long-term oral glucocorticoid prescriptions in the UK over the past 20 years. Rheumatology. 2011; 50(11): 1982–90. https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/ker017.


13. Bienvenu B., Ly K.H., Lambert M. et al. Management of giant cell arteritis: Recommendations of the French Study Group for Large Vessel Vasculitis (GEFA). Rev Med Interne. 2016; 37(3): 154–65. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.revmed.2015.12.015.


14. Maz M., Chung S.A., Abril A. et al. 2021 American College of Rheumatology/Vasculitis Foundation guideline for the management of giant cell arteritis and Takayasu arteritis. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2021; 73(8): 1349–65. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/art.41774.


15. Ассоциация ревматологов России. Федеральные рекомендации по диагностике и лечению системных васкулитов. 2013. Доступ: https://rheumatolog.ru/experts/klinicheskie-rekomendacii/ (дата обращения – 01.01.2023). [Association of Rheumatologists of Russia. Federal guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of systemic vasculitis. 2013.URL: https://rheumatolog.ru/experts/klinicheskie-rekomendacii/ (date of access – 01.01.2023) (In Russ.)].


16. Hellmich B., Agueda A., Monti S. et al. 2018 Update of the EULAR recommendations for the management of large vessel vasculitis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2020; 79(1): 19–30. https://dx.doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2019-215672.


17. Huscher D., Thiele K., Gromnica-Ihle E. et al. Dose-related patterns of glucocorticoid-induced side effects. Ann Rheum Dis. 2009; 68(7): 1119–24. https://dx.doi.org/10.1136/ard.2008.092163.


18. Da Silva J.A.P., Jacobs J.W.G., Kirwan J.R. et al. Safety of low dose glucocorticoid treatment in rheumatoid arthritis: Published evidence and prospective trial data. Ann Rheum Dis. 2006; 65(3): 285–93. https://dx.doi.org/10.1136/ard.2005.038638.


19. Saag K.G., Koehnke R., Caldwell J.R. et al. Low dose long-term corticosteroid therapy in rheumatoid arthritis: An analysis of serious adverse events. Am J Med. 1994; 96(2): 115–23. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0002-9343(94)90131-7.


20. Van Staa T.P., Leufkens H.G.M., Abenhaim L. et al. Use of oral corticosteroids and risk of fractures. J Bone Miner Res. 2000; 15(6): 993–1000. https://dx.doi.org/10.1359/jbmr.2000.15.6.993.


21. Dejaco C., Brouwer E., Mason J.C. et al. Giant cell arteritis and polymyalgia rheumatica: Current challenges and opportunities. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2017; 13(10): 578–92. https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrrheum.2017.142.


22. Labarca C., Koster M.J., Crowson C.S. et al. Predictors of relapse and treatment outcomes in biopsy-proven giant cell arteritis: A retrospective cohort study. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2016; 55(2): 347–56. https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/kev348.


23. Broder M.S., Sarsour K., Chang E. et al. Corticosteroid-related adverse events in patients with giant cell arteritis: A claims-based analysis. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2016; 46(2): 246–52. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.semarthrit.2016.05.009.


24. Мешков А.Д. Оптимизация определения активности и прогноза артериита Хортона. Диссертация на соискание ученой степени кандидата медицинских наук. 2015. Доступ: https://dissercat.com/content/optimizatsiya-opredeleniya-aktivnosti-i-prognoza-arteriita-khortona (дата обращения – 01.01.2023). [Meshkov A.D. Optimization of determining of the activity and prognosis of Horton’s arteritis. Thesis for the degree of candidate of medical sciences. 2015. URL: https://dissercat.com/content/optimizatsiya-opredeleniya-aktivnosti-i-prognoza-arteriita-khortona (date of access – 01.01.2023) (In Russ.)].


25. Proven A., Gabriel S.E., Orces C. et al. Glucocorticoid therapy in giant cell arteritis: Duration and adverse outcomes. Arthritis Care Res. 2003; 49(5): 703–8. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/art.11388.


26. Mahr A.D., Jover J.A., Spiera R.F. et al. Adjunctive methotrexate for treatment of giant cell arteritis: An individual patient data meta-analysis. Arthritis Rheum. 2007; 56(8): 2789–97. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/art.22754.


27. Jover J.A., Hernandez-Garcia C., Morado I.C. et al. Combined treatment of giant-cell arteritis with methotrexate and prednisone. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Ann Intern Med. 2001; 134(2): 106–14.https://dx.doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-134-2-200101160-00010.


28. Braun J., Kastner P., Flaxenberg P. et al. Comparison of the clinical efficacy and safety of subcutaneous versus oral administration of methotrexate in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis: results of a six-month, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, controlled, phase IV trial. Arthritis Rheum. 2008; 58(1): 73–81. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/art.23144.


29. Stone J.H., Tuckwell K., Dimonaco S. et al. Trial of tocilizumab in giant-cell arteritis. 2017; 377(4): 317–28.https://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1613849.


30. De Silva M., Hazleman B.L. Azathioprine in giant cell arteritis/polymyalgia rheumatica: A double-blind study. Ann Rheum Dis. 1986; 45(2): 136–38. https://dx.doi.org/10.1136/ard.45.2.136.


31. Karabayas M., Dospinescu P., Fluck N. et al. Evaluation of adjunctive mycophenolate for large vessel giant cell arteritis. Rheumatol Adv Pract. 2020; 4(2): rkaa069. https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/rap/rkaa069.


32. Diamantopoulos A.P., Hetland H., Myklebust G. Leflunomide as a corticosteroid-sparing agent in giant cell arteritis and polymyalgia rheumatica: A case series. Biomed Res Int. 2013; 2013: 120638. https://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/120638.


33. Findeisen K.E., Sewell J., Ostor A.J.K. Biological therapies for rheumatoid arthritis: An overview for the clinician. Biologics. 2021; 15: 343–52. https://dx.doi.org/10.2147/BTT.S252575.


34. Sepriano A., Kerschbaumer A., Smolen J.S. et al. Safety of synthetic and biological DMARDs: A systematic literature review informing the 2019 update of the EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2020; 79(6): 760–70. https://dx.doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2019-216653.


35. Насонов Е.Л., Лила А.М. Ингибиторы Янус-киназ при иммуновоспалительных ревматических заболеваниях: новые возможности и перспективы. Научно-практическая ревматология. 2019; 57(1): 8–16. [Nasonov E.L., Lila A.M. Janus kinase inhibitors in immuno-inflammatory rheumatic diseases: New opportunities and prospects. Nauchno-prakticheskaya revmatologiya = Scientific and Practical Rheumatology. 2019; 57(1): 8–16 (In Russ.)]. https://dx.doi.org/10.14412/1995-4484-2019-8-16. EDN: MMBSNH.


36. Crowson C.S., Matteson E.L., Myasoedova E. et al. The lifetime risk of adult-onset rheumatoid arthritis and other inflammatory autoimmune rheumatic diseases. Arthritis Rheum. 2011; 63(3): 633–39. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/art.30155.


37. Watanabe R., Goronzy J.J., Berry G. et al. Giant cell arteritis: From pathogenesis to therapeutic management. Curr Treatm Opt Rheumatol. 2016; 2(2): 126–37. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40674-016-0043-x.


38. Филатова Е.Е., Чачило Е.В., Буланов Н.М. с соавт. Гигантоклеточный артериит в сочетании с ревматической полимиалгией: клинические проявления, диагностика и лечение. Клиническая фармакология и терапия. 2022; 31(1): 75–82. [Filatova E.E., Chachilo E.V., Bulanov N.M. et al. Giant cell arteritis in combination with rheumatic polymyalgia: Clinical manifestations, diagnosis and treatment. Klinicheskaya farmakologiya i terapiya = Clinical Pharmacology and Therapy. 2022; 31(1): 75–82 (In Russ.)].https://dx.doi.org/10.32756/0869-5490-2022-1-75-82. EDN: SGANSN.


39. Государственный реестр лекарственных средств Минздрава России. Инструкция по медицинскому применению лекарственного препарата Актемра. РУ: ЛП-007556. Доступ: https://grls.rosminzdrav.ru/Grls_View_v2.aspx?routingGuid=f9c192db-e07b-4d3c-b856-b5e6c7f1ab5b&t= (дата обращения – 01.01.2023). [State Register of Medicines of the Ministry of Healthcare of Russia. Instructions for the medical use of the drug Actemra. Registration certificate: ЛП-007556. URL: https://grls.rosminzdrav.ru/Grls_View_v2.aspx?routingGuid=f9c192db-e07b-4d3c-b856-b5e6c7f1ab5b&t= (date of access – 01.01.2023) (In Russ.)].


40. Villiger P.M., Adler S., Kuchen S. et al. Tocilizumab for induction and maintenance of remission in giant cell arteritis: A phase 2, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2016; 387(10031): 1921–27.https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00560-2.


41. Specker C., Aringer M., Burmester G.R. et al. The safety and effectiveness of tocilizumab in elderly patients with rheumatoid arthritis and in patients with comorbidities associated with age. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2022; 40(9): 1657–65.https://dx.doi.org/10.55563/clinexprheumatol/f7ff6q.


42. Мешков А.Д., Новиков П.И., Фомин В.В., Моисеев С.В. Гигантоклеточный артериит: трудности диагностики и методы лечения. Клиническая фармакология и терапия. 2014; 23(2): 48–54. [Meshkov A.D., Novikov P.I., Fomin.V.V., Moiseev S.V. Giant cell arteritis: Difficulties of diagnosis and methods of treatment. Klinicheskaya farmakologiya i terapiya = Clinical Pharmacology and Therapy. 2014; 23(2): 48–54 (In Russ.)]. EDN: SZHBAD.


43. Schmidt W.A., Dasgupta B., Luqmani R. et al. A multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of sirukumab in the treatment of giant cell arteritis. Rheumatol Ther. 2020; 7(4): 793–810.https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40744-020-00227-2.


44. Мазуров В.И., Беляева И.Б., Самигуллина Р.Р. с соавт. Патогенетическая значимость применения гуманизированного моноклонального антитела к рецептору ИЛ6-α (тоцилизумаб) в терапии иммуновоспалительных заболеваний. Медицинский совет. 2020; (8): 102–112. [Mazurov V.I., Belyaeva I.B., Samigullina R.R. et al. Pathogenetic significance of the use of a humanized monoclonal antibody to the il-6-α receptor (Tocilizumab) in the treatment of immuno-inflammatory diseases. Meditsinskiy sovet = Medical Council. 2020; (8): 102–112 (In Russ.)]. https://dx.doi.org/10.21518/2079-701X-2020-8-102-112. EDN: ZCDFXO.


45. Насонов Е.Л., Мазуров В.И., Усачева Ю.В. Разработки отечественных оригинальных генно-инженерных биологических препаратов для лечения иммуновоспалительных ревматических заболеваний. Научно-практическая ревматология. 2017; 55(2): 201–210. [Nasonov E.L., Mazurov V.I., Usacheva Yu.V. et al. Developments of Russian original biological agents for the treatment of immunoinflammatory rheumatic diseases. Nauchno-prakticheskaya revmatologiya = Scientific and Practical Rheumatology. 2017; 55(2): 201–210 (In Russ.)]. https://dx.doi.org/10.14412/1995-4484-2017-201-210. EDN: YSTSXR.


46. Мазуров В.И., Беляева И.Б., Самигуллина Р.Р. с соавт. Участие интерлейкина 6 в формировании патогенетических механизмов иммуновоспалительных заболеваний. Эффективная фармакотерапия. 2022; 18(8): 22–31. [Mazurov V.I., Belyayeva I.B., Samigullina R.R., Chudinov A.L., Dadalova A.M. The participation of interleukin 6 in the formation of pathogenetic mechanisms of immuno-inflammatory diseases. Effektivnaya farmakoterapiya = Effective Pharmacotherapy. 2022; 18(8): 22–31 (In Russ.)].https://dx.doi.org/10.33978/2307-3586-2022-18-8-22-30. EDN: SVJPPN.


47. Hunter C.A., Jones S.A. IL-6 as a keystone cytokine in health and disease. Nat Immunol. 2015; 16(5): 448–57.https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ni.3153.


48. Smolen J.S., Feist E., Fatenejad S. et al. Olokizumab versus placebo or adalimumab in rheumatoid arthritis. N Engl J Med. 2022; 387(8): 715–26. https://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMOA2201302.


49. Feist E., Fatenejad S., Grishin S. et al. Olokizumab, a monoclonal antibody against interleukin-6, in combination with methotrexate in patients with rheumatoid arthritis inadequately controlled by tumour necrosis factor inhibitor therapy: Efficacy and safety results of a randomised controlled phase III study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2022; 81(12): 1661–68. https://dx.doi.org/10.1136/ard-2022-222630.


50. Zhang H., Watanabe R., Berry G.J. et al. Inhibition of JAK-STAT signaling suppresses pathogenic immune responses in medium and large vessel vasculitis. Circulation. 2018; 137(18): 1934–48. https://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.030423.


51. Koster M.J., Crowson C.S., Giblon R.E. et al. Baricitinib for relapsing giant cell arteritis: a prospective open-label 52-week pilot study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2022; 81(6): 861–67. https://dx.doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2021-221961.


52. Ly K.H., Stirnemann J.O., Liozon E., Michel M.et al. Interleukin-1 blockade in refractory giant cell arteritis. Jt Bone Spine. 2014; 81(1): 76–78. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbspin.2013.06.004.


53. Deshayes S., Ly K.H., Rieu V. et al. Steroid-sparing effect of anakinra in giant-cell arteritis: A case series with clinical, biological and iconographic long-term assessments. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2021; 61(1): 400–6. https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/keab280.


54. ClinicalTrials.gov. Giant Cell Arteritis and Anakinra Trial (GiAnT). ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02902731.URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02902731 (date of access – 01.01.2023).


55. Matteson E.L., Dasgupta B., Schmidt W.A. et al. A 2-week single-blind, randomized, 3-ARM proof of concept study of the effects of secukinumab (anti-il17 MAB), canakinumab (anti-IL-1 B MAB), or corticosteroids on initial disease activity scores in patients with PMR, followed by an open-label extension to assess safety and effect duration. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2014; 66(Suppl): 391–92.


56. Institut de Recherches Internationales Servier. Abbreviated Clinical Study CL2-78989-012 Report Synopsis. 2016. URL: https://clinicaltrials.servier.com/wp-content/uploads/CL2-78989-012_synopsis_report.pdf (date of access – 01.01.2023).


57. Venhoff N., Schmidt W.A., Lamprecht P. et al. Efficacy and safety of secukinumab in patients with giant cell arteritis: Study protocol for a randomized, parallel group, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase II trial. Trials. 2021; 22(1); 543.https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-021-05520-1.


58. Tomelleri A., Rinaldi E., Campochiaro C. et al. Successful use of ixekizumab for glucocorticoid-free remission maintenance in giant cell arteritis. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2023; 62(2): e24–e26. https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/keac416.


59. Conway R., O’Neill L., Gallagher P. et al. Ustekinumab for refractory giant cell arteritis: A prospective 52-week trial. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2018; 48(3): 523–28. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.semarthrit.2018.04.004.


60. Matza M.A., Fernandes A.D., Stone J.H., Unizony S.H. Ustekinumab for the treatment of giant cell arteritis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2021; 73(6): 893–97. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acr.24200.


61. Langford C.A., Cuthbertson D., Ytterberg S.R. et al. A randomized, double-blind trial of abatacept (CTLA-4Ig) for the treatment of giant cell arteritis. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017; 69(4): 837–45. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/art.40044.


62. Rossi D., Cecchi I., Sciascia S. et al. An agent-to-agent real life comparison study of tocilizumab versus abatacept in giant cell arteritis. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2021; 39 Suppl 129(2): 125–128. https://dx.doi.org/10.55563/clinexprheumatol/l0hd9v.


63. Cid M.C., Unizony S.H., Blockmans D. et al. Efficacy and safety of mavrilimumab in giant cell arteritis: A phase 2, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. 2022; 81(5): 653–61. https://dx.doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2021-221865.


64. Study of the benefit of early treatment with an endothelin inhibitor (Bosentan) in patients with sudden blindness due to giant cell arteritis: CECIBO. Case Med Res. Published online 2000. https://dx.doi.org/10.31525/ct1-nct03841734.


65. Harkins P., Conway R. Giant cell arteritis: what is new in the preclinical and early clinical development pipeline? Expert Opin Investig Drugs. 2022; 31(9): 921–32. https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13543784.2021.1940949.


66. Hoffman G.S., Cid M.C., Rendt-Zagar K.E. et al. Infliximab for maintenance of glucocorticosteroid-induced remission of giant cell arteritis: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med. 2007; 146(9): 621–30. https://dx.doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-146-9-200705010-00004.


67. Seror R., Baron G., Hachulla E. et al. Adalimumab for steroid sparing in patients with giant-cell arteritis: Results of a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Ann Rheum Dis. 2014; 73(12): 2074–81. https://dx.doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-203586.


68. Martinez-Taboada V.M., Rodriguez-Valverde V., Carreno L. et al. A double-blind placebo controlled trial of etanercept in patients with giant cell arteritis and corticosteroid side effects. Ann Rheum Dis. 2008; 67(5): 625–30. https://dx.doi.org/10.1136/ard.2007.082115.


69. Dasgupta B., Borg F.A., Hassan N. et al. BSR and BHPR guidelines for the management of giant cell arteritis. Rheumatology. 2010; 49(8): 1594–97. https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/keq039a.


70. Mukhtyar C., Guillevin L., Cid M.C. et al. EULAR recommendations for the management of large vessel vasculitis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2009; 68(3): 318–23. https://dx.doi.org/10.1136/ard.2008.088351.


71. Bhatia A., Ell P.J., Edwards J.C.W. Anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody (rituximab) as an adjunct in the treatment of giant cell arteritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2005; 64(7): 1099–100. https://dx.doi.org/10.1136/ard.2005.036533.


72. Mulhearn B., Cooper E., Knights S. Rituximab fails to treat giant cell arteritis in a patient with ACPA-positive rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatol Adv Pract. 2021; 5(1): rkab020. https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/rap/rkab020.


73. Mayrbaeurl B., Hinterreiter M., Burgstaller S. et al. The first case of a patient with neutropenia and giant-cell arteritis treated with rituximab. Clin Rheumatol. 2007; 26(9): 1597–98. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/S10067-007-0684-0.


74. Sandovici M., Van Der Geest N., Van Sleen Y., Brouwer E. Need and value of targeted immunosuppressive therapy in giant cell arteritis. RMD Open. 2022; 8(1): e001652. https://dx.doi.org/10.1136/rmdopen-2021-001652.


About the Autors


Alexey D. Meshkov, PhD in Medical Sciences, rheumatologist, senior researcher at the Laboratory of diseases of the musculoskeletal system, Russian Gerontological Research and Clinical Center of N.I. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University of the Ministry of Healthcare of Russia. Address: 129226, Moscow, 16 1st Leonova Str. E-mail: alexeymeshkov@mail.ru. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5187-0108
Alexey L. Maslyansky, MD, rheumatologist, head of the Research laboratory of rheumatology and immunopathology, V.A. Almazov National Medical Research Center of the Ministry of Healthcare of Russia, professor of the Scientific, Clinical and Educational Center of Gastroenterology and Hepatology of Saint Petersburg State University. Address: 197341, Saint Petersburg, 2 Akkuratova Str. E-mail: esc_4@mail.ru. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2427-4148
Olga N. Tkacheva, MD, professor, head of the Department of diseases of aging of the Faculty of additional professional education, N.I. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University of the Ministry of Healthcare of Russia, director of Russian Gerontological Research and Clinical Center of N.I. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University of the Ministry of Healthcare of Russia, Chief freelance geriatrician of the Ministry of Healthcare of Russia. Address: 129226, Moscow, 16 1st Leonova Str. E-mail: rgnkc@rgnkc.ru.
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4193-688X
Vadim I. Mazurov, MD, professor, academician of RAS, Chief scientific consultant, director of the Research Institute of Rheumatology and head of the Department of therapy, rheumatology, examination of temporary disability and quality of medical care named after E.E. Eichwald, I.I. Mechnikov North-Western State Medical University, head of the Center for autoimmune diseases of Clinical Rheumatology Hospital No. 25 (Saint Petersburg), Honored Worker of Science of the Russian Federation. Address: 191014, Saint Petersburg, 41 Kirochnaya Str. E-mail: maz.nwgmu@yandex.ru. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0797-2051


Similar Articles


Бионика Медиа