Management of elderly patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation: focus on «fragile» patients


DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.18565/therapy.2021.5.112-120

Roytberg G.E., Slastnikova I.D., Sharkhun O.O.

N.I. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University of the Ministry of Healthcare of Russia, Moscow
Abstract. The review presents data on stroke prevention, symptom reduction and cardiovascular risk reduction in atrial fibrillation (AF) in geriatric patients with fragility syndrome. The clinical benefit of prescribing anticoagulants to «fragile» patients has been demonstrated; however, in real clinical practice, anticoagulants are prescribed much less frequently and in reduced doses compared to «non-fragile» patients. To reduce symptoms associated with AF, heart rate and rhythm control strategies are discussed. To reduce the cardiovascular risk, the importance of regular assessment of the patient’s condition with ECG monitoring, renal function, geriatric status, revision of drug therapy, and identification of modifiable barriers that reduce the effectiveness/safety of therapy is emphasized. Management of «fragile» patients with AF should include a patient-oriented approach, effective management of concomitant diseases, correction of cardiometabolic factors, control of geriatric status, and regular analysis of the therapy. To develop the most optimal management of «fragile» patients with AF, it is necessary to conduct controlled randomized trials in this vulnerable patient population.

Literature



  1. Hanon O., Assayag P., Belmin J. et al. Expert consensus of the French society of geriatrics and gerontology and the French society of cardiology on the management of atrial fibrillation in elderly people. Geriatr Psychol Neuropsychiatr Vieil. 2013; 11(2): 117–43. doi: 10.1016/j.acvd.2013.04.001.

  2. Amin A., Houmsse A., Ishola A. et al. The current approach of atrial fibrillation management. Avicenna J Med. 2016; 6(1): 8–16. doi: 10.4103/2231-0770.173580.

  3. Odutayo A., Wong C.X., Hsiao A.J. et al. Atrial fibrillation and risks of cardiovascular disease, renal disease, and death: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2016; 354: i4482. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i4482.

  4. О.Н. Ткачева, Ю.В. Котовская, Н.К. Рунихина с соавт. Клинические рекомендации «Старческая астения». Российский журнал гериатрической медицины. 2020; 1: 11–46. [Tkacheva O.N., Kotovskaya Yu.V., Runikhina N.K. et al. Clinical guidelines on frailty. Rossiyskiy zhurnal geriatricheskoy meditsiny = Russian Journal of Geriatric Medicine. 2020; 1: 11–46 (In Russ.)]. doi: https://doi.org/10.37586/2686-8636-1-2020-11-46.

  5. Searle S.D., Mitnitski A., Gahbauer E.A. et al. A standard procedure for creating a frailty index. BMC Geriatr. 2008; 8: 24. doi: 10.1186/1471-2318-8-24.

  6. Fried L.P., Tangen C.M., Walston J. et al. Frailty in older adults: evidence for a phenotype. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2001; 56(3): M146–56. doi: 10.1093/gerona/56.3.m146.

  7. Faller J.W., Pereira D.N., de Souza S. et al. Instruments for the detection of frailty syndrome in older adults: A systematic review. PLoS One. 2019; 14(4): e0216166. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0216166.

  8. Villani E.R., Tummolo A.M., Palmer K. et al. Frailty and atrial fibrillation: a systematic review. Eur J Intern Med. 2018; 56: 33–38. doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2018.04.018.

  9. Oqab Z., Pournazari P., Sheldon R.S. What is the impact of frailty on prescription of anticoagulation in elderly patients with atrial fibrillation? A Systematic review and meta-analysis. J Atr Fibrillation. 2018; 10(6): 1870. doi: 10.4022/jafib.1870.

  10. Ekerstad N., Karlsson Th., Soderqvist S. et al. Hospitalized frail elderly patients – atrial fibrillation, anticoagulation and 12 months’ outcomes. Clin Interv Aging. 2018; 13: 749–56. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S159373.

  11. Wilkinson C., Clegg A., Todd O. et al. Atrial fibrillation and oral anticoagulation in older people with frailty: a nationwide primary care electronic health records cohort study. Age Ageing. 2020: afaa265. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afaa265.

  12. Marzona I., O’Donnell M., Teo K. et al. Increased risk of cognitive and functional decline in patients with atrial fibrillation: results of the ONTARGET and TRANSCEND studies. CMAJ. 2012; 184(6): E329–E336. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.111173.

  13. Hindricks G., Potpara T., Dagres N. et al. 2020 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2021; 42(5): 373–498. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa612.

  14. Wolf P.A., Abbott R.D., Kannel W.B. Atrial fibrillation as an independent risk factor for stroke: the Framingham Study Stroke. 1991; 22(8): 983–88. doi: 10.1161/01.str.22.8.983.

  15. Raposeiras-Roubın S., Alonso Rodrıguez D., Camacho Freire S.J. et al. Vitamin K antagonists and direct oral anticoagulants in nonagenarian patients with atrial fibrillation. J Am Med Directors Assoc. 2020; 21(3): 367–73.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2019.08.033.

  16. Nguyen T.N., Cumming R.G., Hilmer S.N. Atrial fibrillation in older inpatients: are there any differences in clinical characteristics and pharmacological treatment between the frail and the non-frail? Intern Med J. 2016; 46(1): 86–95. doi: 10.1111/imj.12912.

  17. Fernandez S.C, Formiga F., Camafort M. Antithrombotic treatment in elderly patients with atrial fibrillation: a practical approach. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2015; 15: 143. doi: 10.1016/j.rce.2014.11.024.

  18. Schafer A., Flierl U., Berliner D. et al. Anticoagulants for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation in elderly patients. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2020; 34(4): 555–68. doi: 10.1007/s10557-020-06981-3.

  19. Sadlon A.H., Tsakiris D.A. Direct oral anticoagulants in the elderly: systematic review and meta-analysis of evidence, current and future directions. Swiss Med Wkly. 2016; 146: w14356. doi: 10.4414/smw.2016.14356.

  20. Kim I.S., Kim H.J., Kim T.H. et al. Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants have better efficacy and equivalent safety compared to warfarin in elderly patients with atrial fibrillation: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Cardiol. 2018; 72(2): 105–12. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2018.01.015.

  21. Malik A.H., Yandrapalli S., Aronow W.S. et al. Meta-analysis of direct-acting oral anticoagulants compared with warfarin in patients >75 years of age. Am J Cardiol. 2019; 123(12): 2051–57. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2019.02.060.

  22. Hanon O., Jeandel C., Jouanny P. et al. Anticoagulant treatment in elderly patients with atrial fibrillation: A position paper. Geriatr Psychol Neuropsychiatr Vieil. 2019; 17(4): 341–54. doi: 10.1684/pnv.2020.0883.

  23. Hohmann C., Hohnloser S.H., Jacob J. et al. Non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants in comparison to phenprocoumon in geriatric and non-geriatric patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. Thromb Haemost. 2019; 119(6): 971–80. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1683422.

  24. Kim H.M., Choi E.K., Park C.S. et al. Effectiveness and safety of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants in octogenarian patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. PloS One. 2019; 14 (3): e0211766. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0211766.

  25. Friberg L., Rosenqvist M. Less dementia with oral anticoagulation in atrial fibrillation. Eur Heart J. 2018; 39(6): 453–60. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx579.

  26. Jacobs V., Woller S.C., Stevens S. et al. Time outside of therapeutic range in atrial fibrillation patients is associated with long-term risk of dementia. Heart Rhythm. 2014; 11(12): 2206–13. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2014.08.013.

  27. Graham D.J., Baro E., Zhang R. et al. Comparative stroke, bleeding, and mortality risks in older Medicare patients treated with oral anticoagulants for nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Am J Med. 2019; 132(5): 596–604.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2018.12.023.

  28. Deng, K., Cheng, J., Rao, S. et al. Efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants in elderly patients with atrial fibrillation: a network meta-analysis. Front Med (Lausanne). 2020; 7: 107. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2020.00107.

  29. Deitelzweig S., Luo X., Gupta K. et al. Comparison of effectiveness and safety of treatment with apixaban vs. other oral anticoagulants among elderly nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients. Curr Med Res Opin. 2017; 33(10): 1745–54. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2017.1334638.

  30. Pazan F., Weiss C., Wehling M. et al. The FORTA (Fit fOR The Aged) list 2018: Third version of a validated clinical tool for improved drug treatment in older people. Drugs Aging. 2019; 36(5): 481–84. doi: 10.1007/s40266-019-00669-6.

  31. Diener H.-C., Aisenberg J., Ansell J. et al. Choosing a particular oral anticoagulant and dose for stroke prevention in individual patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation: part 2. Eur Heart J. 2017; 38(12): 860–68. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehw069.

  32. Grymonprez M., Steurbaut S., De Backer T. L. et al. Effectiveness and safety of oral anticoagulants in older patients with atrial fibrillation: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Pharmacol. 2020; 11: 583311. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2020.583311.

  33. Lip G.Y.H., Keshishian A.V., Kang A.L. et al. Oral anticoagulants for nonvalvular atrial fibrillation in frail elderly patients: Insights from the ARISTOPHANES study J Intern Med. 2021; 289(1): 42–52. doi: 10.1111/joim.13140.

  34. Biteker M., Başaran O., Dogan V. et al. Real-world clinical characteristics and treatment patterns of individuals aged 80 and older with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation: Results from the ReAl-life Multicenter Survey Evaluating Stroke Study. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2017; 65(8): 1684–90. doi: 10.1111/jgs.14855.

  35. Caldeira, D., Nunes-Ferreira A., Rodrigues R. et al. Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants in elderly patients with atrial fibrillation: A systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2019; 81: 209–14. doi: 10.1016/ j.archger.2018.12.013.

  36. Induruwa I., Evans N.R., Aziz A. et al. Clinical frailty is independently associated with non-prescription of anticoagulants in older patients with atrial fibrillation. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2017; 17(11): 2178–83. doi: 10.1111/ggi.13058.

  37. Воробьева Н.М., Ткачева О.Н. Антикоагулянтная терапия у «хрупких» пожилых пациентов: современное состояние проблемы. Рациональная фармакотерапия в кардиологии. 2018; 6: 908–916. [Vorobyeva N.M., Tkacheva O.N. Anticoagulant therapy in «fragile» elderly patients: current state of the problem. Ratsional’naya farmakoterapiya v kardiologii = Rational Pharmacotherapy in Cardiology. 2018; 6: 908–916 (In Russ.)]. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.20996/1819-6446-2018-14-6-908-916.

  38. Дьячков В.А., Рубаненко А.О., Щукин Ю.В. Пожилой пациент с фибрилляцией предсердий. Кардиология: новости, мнения, обучение. 2018; 2: 38–47. [Dyachkov V.A., Rubanenko A.O., Shchukin Yu.V. Elderly patients with atrial fibrillation. Kardiologiya: novosti, mneniya, obucheniye = Cardiology: News, Opinions, Training. 2018; 2: 38–47 (In Russ.)]. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.24411/2309-1908-2018-12005.

  39. Hakim F.A., Shen W.K. Atrial fibrillation in the elderly: a review. Future Cardiol. 2014; 10(6): 745–58. doi: 10.2217/fca.14.32.

  40. Lobos-Bejarano J.M., del Castillo-Rodríguez J.C., Mena-Gonzalez A. et al. Patients’ characteristics and clinical management of atrial fibrillation in primary healthcare in Spain: FIATE Study. Med Clin (Barc). 2013; 141(7): 279–86. doi: 10.1016/j.medcli.2012.12.023.

  41. Diez-Villanueva P., Alfonso F. Atrial fibrillation in the elderly. J Geriatr Cardiol. 2019; 16(1): 49–53. doi: 10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2019.01.005.

  42. Sławuta A., Jacek P., Mazur G. et al. Quality of life and frailty syndrome in patients with atrial fibrillation. Clin Interv Aging. 2020; 15: 783–95. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S248170.

  43. Mlynarska A., Mlynarski R., Golba K.S. Frailty syndrome in patients with heart rhythm disorders. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2017; 17(9): 1313–18. doi: 10.1111/pace.12800.

  44. Paciullo F., Proietti M., Bianconi V. et al. Choice and outcomes of rate control versus rhythm control in elderly patients with atrial fibrillation: a report from the REPOSI study. Drugs Aging. 2018; 35(4): 365–73. doi: 10.1007/s40266-018-0532-8.

  45. Groenveld H.F., Tijssen J.G., Crijns H.J. et al. Rate control efficacy in permanent atrial fibrillation: successful and failed strict rate control against a background of lenient rate control: data from RACE II (Rate Control Efficacy in Permanent Atrial Fibrillation). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013; 61(7): 741–48. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.11.038.

  46. Szentmiklosi A.J., Szentandrassy N., Hegyi B. et al. Chemistry, physiology, and pharmacology of β-adrenergic mechanisms in the heart. Why are β-blocker antiarrhythmics superior? Curr Pharm Des. 2015; 21(8): 1030–41. doi: 10.2174/1381612820666141029111240.

  47. Turakhia M.P., Santangeli P., Winkelmayer W.C. et al. Increased mortality associated with digoxin in contemporary patients with atrial fibrillation: findings from the TREAT-AF study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014; 64: 660–68. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.03.060.

  48. Ziff O.J., Lane D.A., Samra M. et al. Safety and efficacy of digoxin: systematic review and meta-analysis of observational and controlled trial data. BMJ. 2015; 351: h4451. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h4451.

  49. Botto G., Piemontese C., Russo G. Rhythm-control vs rate-control in the elderly: When to do it and which drug to prefer? Monaldi Arch Chest Dis. 2018; 88(2): 949. doi: 10.4081/monaldi.2018.949.

  50. Mlynarska A., Mlynarski R., Marcisz C., Golba K.S. Modified frailty as a novel factor in predicting the maintenance of the sinus rhythm after electrical cardioversion of atrial fibrillation in the elderly population. Clin Interv Aging. 2020; 15: 1193–99. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S255853.

  51. Friberg L. Ventricular arrhythmia and death among atrial fibrillation patients using anti-arrhythmic drugs. Am Heart J. 2018; 205: 118–27. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2018.06.018.

  52. Dalgaard F., Pallisgaard J. L., Nume A.K. et al. Rate or rhythm control in older atrial fibrillation patients: Risk of fall-related injuries and syncope. Am Geriatr Soc. 2019; 67(10): 2023–30. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16062.

  53. Lioni L., Letsas K.P., Efremidis M. et al. Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in the elderly. J Geriatr Cardiol. 2014; 11(4): 291–95. doi: 10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2014.04.003.

  54. Bulava A, Hanis J, Dusek L. Clinical outcomes of radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in octogenarians-10-year experience of a one high volume center. J Geriatr Cardiol. 2017; 14(9): 575–81. doi: 10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2017.09.007.

  55. Noheria A., Shrader P., Piccini J.P. et al. Rhythm control versus rate control and clinical outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation: Results from the ORBIT-AF Registry. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2016; 2(2): 221–29. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2015.11.001.

  56. Damanti S., Pasina L., Cortesi L. et al. Atrial fibrillation: Possible influences of rate and rhythm control strategy on cognitive performance. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2018; 66(11): 2178–82 doi: 10.1111/jgs.15568.


About the Autors


Grigori E. Roytberg, MD, professor, academician of RAS, head of the Department of therapy, general practice and nuclear medicine, N.I. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University of the Ministry of Healthcare of Russia. Address: 117997, Moscow, 1 Ostrovityaninova Str. Tel.: +7 (495) 251-56-84. ORCID: 0000-0003-0514-9114
Irina D. Slastnikova, PhD, associate professor of the Department of therapy, general practice and nuclear medicine, N.I. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University of the Ministry of Healthcare of Russia. Address: 117997, Moscow, 1 Ostrovityaninova Str. Tel.: +7 (495) 251-56-84. E-mail: slastid@mail.ru. ORCID: 0000-0002-4076-2849
Olga O. Sharkhun, MD, associate professor of the Department of therapy, general practice and nuclear medicine, N.I. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University of the Ministry of Healthcare of Russia. Address: 117997, Moscow, 1 Ostrovityaninova Str. Tel.: +7 (495) 251-56-84. E-mail: slastid@mail.ru. ORCID: 0000-0001-8527-4681


Similar Articles


Бионика Медиа