Pharmacoeconomic analysis of apixaban use for secondary thromboprophylaxis at outpatient stage among oncological patients


DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.18565/therapy.2024.1.160-167

Kasimova A.R., Kolbin A.S.

1) Academician I.P. Pavlov First Saint Petersburg State Medical University of the Ministry of Healthcare of Russia; 2) R.R. Vreden National Medical Research Center of Traumatology and Orthopedics of the Ministry of Healthcare of Russia, Saint Petersburg; 3) Saint Petersburg State University
Abstract. Taking into account the need for long-term secondary thromboprophylaxis in patients with cancer incidence, assessing the cost-efficacy of using various therapeutic tactics in such patients is the point of particular interest.
The aim: to make a pharmacoeconomic analysis of validity of Eliquis® (apixaban) medicine use for the secondary prevention of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) in patients with cancer comparatively to other oral anticoagulants’ effect.
Material and methods. The economic assessment was carried out from the perspective of the interests of healthcare of the Russian Federation. The assessment was based on data from previously performed meta-analyses, the results of which were published. Total costs for patient management for each of the compared alternative thromboprophylaxis tactics were determined by calculating the cost of drug therapy, as well as the costs of managing adverse events over 12 months. The conclusion about the most preferable thromboprophylaxis option was made in accordance with obtained data concerning the correlation between efficacy and cost of patient treatment.
Results. During the study, lowest total costs for patient management were fixed when using apixaban: they amounted to 35,082 rubles per year per person. The difference in costs took place mainly due to the cost of treatment with different drugs.
Conclusion. The results of a comparison of effects of apixaban with alternative drugs from the group of direct oral anticoagulants in the prevention of DVT and PE development due to oncologic pathology indicate that the use of this drug may be more valid from the standpoint of economic efficacy, assessed by such a pharmacoeconomic index as direct costs’ minimizing.

Literature


1. Donnellan E., Khorana A.A. Cancer and venous thromboembolic disease: A review. Oncologist. 2017; 22(2): 199–207. https://doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.2016-0214. PMID: 28174293. PMCID: PMC5330704.


2. Heit J.A. Epidemiology of venous thromboembolism. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2015; 12(8): 464–74. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrcardio.2015.83. PMID: 26076949. PMCID: PMC4624298.


3. Heit J.A., Spencer F.A., White R.H. The epidemiology of venous thromboembolism. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2016; 41(1): 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11239-015-1311-6. PMID: 26780736. PMCID: PMC4715842.


4. Prandoni P., Lensing A.W., Piccioli A. et al. Recurrent venous thromboembolism and bleeding complications during anticoagulant treatment in patients with cancer and venous thrombosis. Blood. 2002; 100(10): 3484–88. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2002-01-0108. PMID: 12393647.


5. Бокерия Л.А., Затевахин И.И., Кириенко А.И. с соавт. Российские клинические рекомендации по диагностике, лечению и профилактике венозных тромбоэмболических осложнений (ВТЭО). Флебология. 2015; 9(4–2): 1–52. (Bockeria L.A., Zatevakhin I.I., Kirienko A.I. et al. Russian clinical guidelines for the diagnosis, treatment and prevention of venous thromboembolic complications. Flebologiya = Phlebology. 2015; 9(4–2): 1–52 (In Russ.)). EDN: XIOPYZ.


6. Fuentes H.E., Tafur A.J., Caprini J.A. et al.; RIETE Investigators. Prediction of early mortality in patients with cancer-associated thrombosis in the RIETE Database. Int Angiol. 2019; 38(3): 173–84. https://doi.org/10.23736/S0392-9590.19.04110-5. PMID: 31112023.


7. Khorana A.A., Kuderer N.M., Culakova E. et al. Development and validation of a predictive model for chemotherapy-associated thrombosis. Blood. 2008; 111(10): 4902–7. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2007-10-116327. PMID: 18216292. PMCID: PMC2384124.


8. Pabinger I., Alt-Epping B., Demarmels Biasutti F. et al. (Venous thrombembolism in tumour patients. Hamostaseologie. 2011; 31(4): 281–90; quiz 291–92 (In German)). https://doi.org/10.5482/ha-1174. PMID: 21983992.


9. Wang T.-F., Zwicker J.I., Ay C. et al. The use of direct oral anticoagulants for primary thromboprophylaxis in ambulatory cancer patients: Guidance from the SSC of the ISTH. J Thromb Haemost. 2019; 17(10): 1772–78. https://doi.org/10.1111/jth.14564. PMID: 31353841. PMCID: PMC6773470.


10. Селиверстов Е.И., Лобастов К.В., Илюхин Е.А. с соавт. Профилактика, диагностика и лечение тромбоза глубоких вен. Рекомендации российских экспертов. Флебология. 2023; 17(3): 152–296. (Seliverstov E.I., Lobastov K.V., Ilyukhin E.A. et al. Prevention, diagnostics and treatment of deep vein thrombosis. Russian experts consensus. Flebologiya = Phlebology. 2023; 17(3): 152–296 (In Russ.)). https://doi.org/10.17116/flebo202317031152. EDN: RHOTOW.


11. Key N.S., Khorana A.A., Kuderer N.M. et al. Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis and treatment in patients with cancer: ASCO clinical practice guideline update. J Clin Oncol. 2020; 38(5): 496–520. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.19.01461. PMID: 31381464.


12. Streiff M.B.., Holmstrom B, Angelini D. et al. NCCN guidelines insights: Cancer-associated venous thromboembolic disease, version 2.2018. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2018; 16(11): 1289–303. https://doi.org/10.6004/jnccn.2018.0084. PMID: 30442731.


13. Colwell C.W., Pulido P., Hardwick M.E., Morris B.A. Patient compliance with outpatient prophylaxis: An observational study. Orthopedics. 2005; 28(2): 143–47. https://doi.org/10.3928/0147-7447-20050201-16. PMID: 15751368.


14. Касимова А.Р., Божкова С.А., Сараев А.В. с соавт. Анализ амбулаторного этапа фармакологической тромбопрофилактики у пациентов после эндопротезирования коленного сустава. Флебология. 2020; 14(3): 222–229. (Kasimova A.R., Bozhkova S.A., Saraev A.V. et al. Outpatient pharmacological prevention of venous thromboembolism after knee joint replacement. Flebologiya = Phlebology. 2020; 14(3): 222–229 (In Russ.)). https://doi.org/10.17116/flebo202014031222. EDN: YCKZDB.


15. Колбин А.С., Касимова А.Р., Гиляревский С.Р. Фармакоэкономическая оценка применения апиксабана для лечения и профилактики венозных тромбоэмболий в общей популяции и популяции пациентов, страдающих онкологическими заболеваниями. Качественная клиническая практика. 2022; (4): 38–49. (Kolbin A.S., Kasimova A.R., Gilyarevskiy S.R. Pharmacoeconomic evaluation of apixaban use for the treatment and prevention of venous thromboembolism in the general population and patients with oncological diseases. Kachestvennaya klinicheskaya praktika = Good Clinical Practice. 2022; (4): 38–49 (In Russ.)). https://doi.org/10.37489/2588-0519-2022-4-38-49. EDN: XHNEMT.


16. Young A.M., Marshall A., Thirlwall J. et al. Comparison of an oral factor Xa inhibitor with low molecular weight heparin in patients with cancer with venous thromboembolism: Results of a randomized trial (SELECT-D). J Clin Oncol. 2018; 36(20): 2017–23. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2018.78.8034. PMID: 29746227.


17. McBane R.D. 2nd, Wysokinski W.E., Le-Rademacher J.G. et al. Apixaban and dalteparin in active malignancy-associated venous thromboembolism: The ADAM VTE trial. J Thromb Haemost. 2020; 18(2): 411–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/jth.14662. PMID: 31630479.


18. Agnelli G., Becattini C., Meyer G. et al. Apixaban for the treatment of venous thromboembolism associated with cancer. N Engl J Med. 2020; 382(17): 1599–607. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1915103. PMID: 32223112.


19. Raskob G.E., van Es N., Verhamme P. et al. Edoxaban for the treatment of cancer-associated venous thromboembolism. N Engl J Med. 2018; 378(7): 615–24. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1711948. PMID: 29231094.


20. Giustozzi M., Agnelli G., Del Toro-Cervera J. et al. Direct oral anticoagulants for the treatment of acute venous thromboembolism associated with cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Thromb Haemost. 2020; 120(7): 1128–36. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1712098. PMID: 32365386.


21. Nguyen E., White C.M., Patel M.R. et al. Doses of apixaban and rivaroxaban prescribed in real-world United States cardiology practices compared to registration trials. Curr Med Res Opin. 2016; 32(7): 1277–79. https://doi.org/10.1185/03007995.2016.1170672. PMID: 27009372.


22. de Jong L.A., van der Velden A.W.G., Hulst M.V., Postma M.J. Cost-effectiveness analysis and budget impact of rivaroxaban compared with dalteparin in patients with cancer at risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism. BMJ Open. 2020; 10(11): e039057. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039057. PMID: 33444193. PMCID: PMC7678368.


23. Ryan E.S., Havrilesky L.J., Salinaro J.R., Davidson B.A. Cost-effectiveness of venous thromboembolism prophylaxis during neoadjuvant chemotherapy for ovarian cancer. JCO Oncol Pract. 2021; 17(8): e1075–e1084. https://doi.org/10.1200/OP.20.00783. PMID: 33914645.


About the Autors


Alina R. Kasimova, MD, PhD (Medicine), associate professor of the Department of clinical pharmacology and evidence-based medicine, Academician I.P. Pavlov First Saint Petersburg State Medical University of the Ministry of Healthcare of Russia, doctor – clinical pharmacologist at the Department of clinical pharmacology, R.R. Vreden National Medical Research Center of Traumatology and Orthopedics of the Ministry of Healthcare of Russia. Address: 197022, Saint Petersburg, 6–8 Lva Tolstogo St.
E-mail: kasi-alina@yandex.ru
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6284-7133
Alexey S. Kolbin, MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine), professor, head of the Department of clinical pharmacology and evidence-based medicine, Academician I.P. Pavlov First Saint Petersburg State Medical University of the Ministry of Healthcare of Russia, professor of the Department of pharmacology of the Faculty of medicine, Saint Petersburg State University. Address: 197022, Saint Petersburg, 6–8 Lva Tolstogo St.
E-mail: аlex.kolbin@mail.ru
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1919-2909


Similar Articles


Бионика Медиа